Skip to content

x402 vs ACP

Cerebrus services are available through two channels. Choose based on your use case.

x402 (Direct API)ACP (Virtuals Protocol)
Target userDevelopers, bots, dashboardsAutonomous AI agents
PaymentUSDC micropayments on BaseVIRTUAL token escrow
AuthenticationWallet signature (no API keys)ACP SDK + agent wallet
LatencyLow (~200–500ms)Higher (negotiation + escrow + execution)
Pricing$0.01–$0.04 per query$0.03–$2.00 per job
SettlementInstant (Base L2)ACP escrow release
ProtocolHTTP 402 (open standard)Agent Commerce Protocol (Virtuals)
EndpointPriceData
/pulse/{coin}$0.02Multi-timeframe technical analysis
/sentiment$0.01Market sentiment
/funding/{coin}$0.01Funding rate analysis
/bundle/{coin}$0.04All three combined
OfferingPriceService
cerebrus_pulse$0.03Technical analysis (same data as x402)
cerebrus_lite$0.10Single-model AI synthesis
cerebrus_synthesis$0.503-model AI synthesis
cerebrus_premium$2.005+ model deep synthesis
  • You’re building a dashboard or monitoring tool that needs frequent data pulls
  • You want the lowest latency and lowest cost per query
  • You’re writing a bot or script that consumes structured data
  • You want to avoid the Virtuals ecosystem and use standard HTTP
  • You need high-frequency queries (up to 1,000/day)
  • You’re building an autonomous AI agent on Virtuals Protocol
  • You need AI synthesis (not just raw data) — multi-model analysis with reasoning
  • You want your agent to participate in the Virtuals marketplace
  • You need complex, long-running analysis (up to 5 minutes)
  • You want agent-to-agent discovery and negotiation

Yes. Many teams use x402 for real-time data feeds and ACP for deeper analysis:

  1. x402 /pulse/BTC → Get live technical indicators (200ms, $0.02)
  2. ACP cerebrus_synthesis → “Given these indicators, what’s the medium-term outlook for BTC?” (45s, $0.50)

The data products are complementary — Pulse gives you structured numbers, Synthesis gives you AI-powered interpretation.

Moving between x402 and ACP doesn’t require account changes. Both use wallet-based authentication (different wallets and chains, but the same concept). There’s no lock-in to either protocol.